Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan

Equatorial Guinea
777,023 current US$
in 2022
Eritrea
1.14 million current US$
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
127th
Eritrea rank
124th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M198320032023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1.14 million current US$ against 777,023 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 361,337 current US$.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th and Eritrea ranks 124th of 173 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 423,333 current US$ 5.19 million current US$ 4.76 million current US$ Eritrea
2000s 62,000 current US$ 7.35 million current US$ 7.29 million current US$ Eritrea
2010s 139,309 current US$ 4.13 million current US$ 3.99 million current US$ Eritrea
2020s 324,256 current US$ 1.66 million current US$ 1.33 million current US$ Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
Eritrea, at 1.14 million current US$ against 777,023 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
361,337 current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th and Eritrea ranks 124th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us/equatorial-guinea/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us/equatorial-guinea/eritrea/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
220 places, 10,167 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.