Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
777,023 current US$
in 2022
Latvia
690,000 current US$
in 2004
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
127th
Latvia rank
129th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Latvia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M198320022022

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 777,023 current US$ against 690,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 87,023 current US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 127th and Latvia ranks 129th of 173 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 552,857 current US$ 262,857 current US$ 290,000 current US$ Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2000s 64,000 current US$ 1.08 million current US$ 1.01 million current US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Latvia?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 777,023 current US$ against 690,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Latvia?
87,023 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Latvia?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 127th and Latvia ranks 129th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us/equatorial-guinea/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us/equatorial-guinea/latvia/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
220 places, 10,167 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.