Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
10.56 % change on previous year
in 2022
Lithuania
400 % change on previous year
in 2004
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
9th
Lithuania rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
-1000100200300400199020062022

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 400 % change on previous year against 10.56 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 389.44 % change on previous year.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 37.9 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 46 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s -10 % change on previous year -4.59 % change on previous year 5.41 % change on previous year Lithuania
2000s 133.33 % change on previous year 189 % change on previous year 55.67 % change on previous year Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 400 % change on previous year against 10.56 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
389.44 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 5,173 data points, 1988–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.