Armenia vs Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Armenia
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.59 million current US$ against 1.42 million current US$ in Armenia, a difference of 166,930 current US$.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 81st of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91,429 current US$ | 62,857 current US$ | 28,571 current US$ | Armenia |
| 2010s | 342,585 current US$ | 931,165 current US$ | 588,580 current US$ | Cuba |
| 2020s | 833,923 current US$ | 1.63 million current US$ | 798,546 current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Armenia or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 1.59 million current US$ against 1.42 million current US$ in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Armenia and Cuba?
- 166,930 current US$, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cuba?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Cuba rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Armenia ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 81st of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.