Barbados vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Barbados
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 70,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Czechia ahead.
Barbados ranks 142nd and Czechia ranks 141st of 155 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,944 current US$ | 58,889 current US$ | 21,944 current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 30,500 current US$ | 68,000 current US$ | 37,500 current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Barbados or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 70,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Barbados as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Barbados and Czechia?
- 10,000 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Czechia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Barbados and Czechia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Barbados ranks 142nd and Czechia ranks 141st of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.