Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-3.59 million current US$
in 2023
China
-5.33 million current US$
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
154th
China rank
155th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • China
-20.0M020.0M40.0M198820052023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -3.59 million current US$ against -5.33 million current US$ in China, a difference of 1.74 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was China ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 154th and China ranks 155th of 155 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina China Difference Ahead
1990s 582,500 current US$ 23.98 million current US$ 23.40 million current US$ China
2000s 4.85 million current US$ 15.14 million current US$ 10.30 million current US$ China
2010s 4.81 million current US$ -5.20 million current US$ 10.02 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s -3.48 million current US$ -3.86 million current US$ 382,395 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or China?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -3.59 million current US$ against -5.33 million current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
1.74 million current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 154th and China ranks 155th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/china/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.