Cameroon vs Euro area: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Cameroon
- Euro area
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 7.01 million current US$ against 240,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 6.77 million current US$.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 29.2 times Euro area's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 43rd and Euro area ranks 44th of 155 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Euro area | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 301,111 current US$ | 148,889 current US$ | 152,222 current US$ | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 356,000 current US$ | 164,000 current US$ | 192,000 current US$ | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Cameroon or Euro area?
- Cameroon, at 7.01 million current US$ against 240,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Cameroon and Euro area?
- 6.77 million current US$, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Euro area?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Cameroon and Euro area rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Cameroon ranks 43rd and Euro area ranks 44th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.