Cuba vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.59 million current US$ against 1.42 million current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 163,650 current US$.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 81st and Georgia ranks 83rd of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62,857 current US$ | 72,857 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2010s | 931,165 current US$ | 174,699 current US$ | 756,466 current US$ | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1.63 million current US$ | 1.49 million current US$ | 144,274 current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Cuba or Georgia?
- Cuba, at 1.59 million current US$ against 1.42 million current US$ in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Cuba and Georgia?
- 163,650 current US$, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Cuba ranks 81st and Georgia ranks 83rd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.