Djibouti vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Djibouti
130,960 current US$
in 2023
Poland
130,000 current US$
in 2004
Djibouti rank
132nd
Poland rank
134th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Djibouti
- Poland
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 130,960 current US$ against 130,000 current US$ in Poland, a difference of 960 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.
Djibouti ranks 132nd and Poland ranks 134th of 155 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,500 current US$ | 2.59 million current US$ | 2.56 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 53,000 current US$ | 434,000 current US$ | 381,000 current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Djibouti or Poland?
- Djibouti, at 130,960 current US$ against 130,000 current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Djibouti and Poland?
- 960 current US$, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Poland?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Djibouti and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Djibouti ranks 132nd and Poland ranks 134th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.