Estonia vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Estonia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 50,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 40,000 current US$.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 5.0 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lithuania ahead.
Estonia ranks 145th and Lithuania ranks 143rd of 155 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 13,750 current US$ | 27,500 current US$ | 13,750 current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Estonia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 50,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Estonia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Estonia and Lithuania?
- 40,000 current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2003.
- How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Estonia ranks 145th and Lithuania ranks 143rd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.