Eswatini vs Naoero: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Eswatini
318,087 current US$
in 2023
Naoero
251,795 current US$
in 2022
Eswatini rank
123rd
Naoero rank
126th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Naoero
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199120072023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 318,087 current US$ against 251,795 current US$ in Naoero, a difference of 66,292 current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Naoero's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 123rd and Naoero ranks 126th of 155 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Naoero in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Naoero Difference Ahead
1990s 86,667 current US$ 32,222 current US$ 54,444 current US$ Eswatini
2000s 93,000 current US$ 104,833 current US$ 11,833 current US$ Naoero
2010s 220,729 current US$ 120,149 current US$ 100,580 current US$ Eswatini
2020s 277,551 current US$ 226,852 current US$ 50,699 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Eswatini or Naoero?
Eswatini, at 318,087 current US$ against 251,795 current US$ in Naoero as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Eswatini and Naoero?
66,292 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Naoero?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Naoero rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 123rd and Naoero ranks 126th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Naoero: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/naoero/">Eswatini vs Naoero: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.