Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Eswatini
318,087 current US$
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
328,700 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini rank
123rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
121st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199120072023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 328,700 current US$ against 318,087 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 10,613 current US$.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 123rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 121st of 155 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 161,111 current US$ 25,556 current US$ 135,556 current US$ Eswatini
2000s 93,000 current US$ 55,333 current US$ 37,667 current US$ Eswatini
2010s 154,851 current US$ 28,858 current US$ 125,993 current US$ Eswatini
2020s 287,685 current US$ 179,878 current US$ 107,807 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 328,700 current US$ against 318,087 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
10,613 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 123rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 121st of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.