Euro area vs Honduras: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time
- Euro area
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 5.90 million current US$ against 240,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 5.66 million current US$.
That makes Honduras's figure about 24.6 times Euro area's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Honduras ahead.
Euro area ranks 44th and Honduras ranks 47th of 46 groups.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 148,889 current US$ | 254,444 current US$ | 105,556 current US$ | Honduras |
| 2000s | 164,000 current US$ | 994,000 current US$ | 830,000 current US$ | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Euro area or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 5.90 million current US$ against 240,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Euro area and Honduras?
- 5.66 million current US$, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Honduras?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Euro area and Honduras rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Euro area ranks 44th and Honduras ranks 47th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.