Kenya vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Kenya
32.45 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
38.11 million current US$
in 2023
Kenya rank
19th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Kenya
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M198920062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 38.11 million current US$ against 32.45 million current US$ in Kenya, a difference of 5.66 million current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Kenya ranks 19th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 155 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 10,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 1.51 million current US$ 336,000 current US$ 1.17 million current US$ Kenya
2000s 3.33 million current US$ 3.51 million current US$ 183,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 9.91 million current US$ 51.95 million current US$ 42.04 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 32.05 million current US$ 61.39 million current US$ 29.33 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Kenya or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 38.11 million current US$ against 32.45 million current US$ in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Kenya and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5.66 million current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Tanzania, United Republic of?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Kenya ranks 19th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/kenya/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/kenya/tanzania/">Kenya vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.