Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Kiribati
2.00 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2.23 million current US$
in 2023
Kiribati rank
72nd
Zimbabwe rank
69th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Kiribati
  • Zimbabwe
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M199120072023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2.23 million current US$ against 2.00 million current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 230,390 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 155 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 33,333 current US$ 39,444 current US$ 6,111 current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 81,500 current US$ 453,000 current US$ 371,500 current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 539,448 current US$ 2.02 million current US$ 1.48 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 2.19 million current US$ 1.76 million current US$ 436,420 current US$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2.23 million current US$ against 2.00 million current US$ in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
230,390 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Kiribati ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/kiribati/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/kiribati/zimbabwe/">Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.