Nauru vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. gaps over time
- Nauru
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 269,321 current US$ against 251,795 current US$ in Nauru, a difference of 17,526 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Uruguay ahead.
Nauru ranks 126th and Uruguay ranks 124th of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,222 current US$ | 150,000 current US$ | 117,778 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 104,833 current US$ | 94,000 current US$ | 10,833 current US$ | Nauru |
| 2010s | 126,696 current US$ | 129,101 current US$ | 2,404 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Nauru or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 269,321 current US$ against 251,795 current US$ in Nauru as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Nauru and Uruguay?
- 17,526 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Uruguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2017.
- How do Nauru and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Nauru ranks 126th and Uruguay ranks 124th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.