Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Sub-Saharan Africa
407.94 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
38.11 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
17th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196019912023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 407.94 million current US$ against 38.11 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 369.83 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 10.7 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 17th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 46 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 1.93 million current US$ 20,000 current US$ 1.91 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 10.46 million current US$ 336,000 current US$ 10.12 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 35.13 million current US$ 3.51 million current US$ 31.62 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 306.72 million current US$ 51.95 million current US$ 254.77 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 462.81 million current US$ 61.39 million current US$ 401.43 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Sub-Saharan Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 407.94 million current US$ against 38.11 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
369.83 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 17th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-gaps-filled/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,679 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.