Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. capita

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.5781 current US$ per person
in 2023
East Timor
10.55 current US$ per person
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
8th
East Timor rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • East Timor
02.557.510196019912023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 10.55 current US$ per person against 0.5781 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 9.97 current US$ per person.

That makes East Timor's figure about 18.3 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 23 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 8th and East Timor ranks 8th of 46 groups.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1204 current US$ per person 0.922 current US$ per person 0.8017 current US$ per person East Timor
2010s 0.2362 current US$ per person 6.22 current US$ per person 5.98 current US$ per person East Timor
2020s 0.4462 current US$ per person 10.16 current US$ per person 9.72 current US$ per person East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or East Timor?
East Timor, at 10.55 current US$ per person against 0.5781 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and East Timor?
9.97 current US$ per person, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and East Timor?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 8th and East Timor ranks 8th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/timor-leste/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,327 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.