Central Europe and the Baltics vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Central Europe and the Baltics
-1.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Uzbekistan
87.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
46th
Uzbekistan rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Uzbekistan
050100150199020062023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 87.17 current US$ per square kilometre against -1.91 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 89.08 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 45.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 45th of 46 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 11.47 current US$ per square kilometre 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre 16.02 current US$ per square kilometre 11.04 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2010s -1.91 current US$ per square kilometre 73.89 current US$ per square kilometre 75.81 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Central Europe and the Baltics or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 87.17 current US$ per square kilometre against -1.91 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Uzbekistan?
89.08 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Uzbekistan?
17 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 45th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/uzbekistan/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.