Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square

Dominican Republic
46.43 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
43.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
63rd
Tanzania rank
65th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k198920062023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 46.43 current US$ per square kilometre against 43.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 63rd and Tanzania ranks 65th of 155 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4205 current US$ per square kilometre 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 52.18 current US$ per square kilometre 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 116.32 current US$ per square kilometre 58.65 current US$ per square kilometre 57.67 current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 630.9 current US$ per square kilometre 69.3 current US$ per square kilometre 561.6 current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Dominican Republic or Tanzania?
Dominican Republic, at 46.43 current US$ per square kilometre against 43.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Dominican Republic and Tanzania?
3.41 current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Dominican Republic ranks 63rd and Tanzania ranks 65th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/tanzania/">Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.