Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Early-demographic dividend
34.95 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
1,037 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
12th
Rwanda rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
02505007501.0k198820052023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre against 34.95 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 1,002 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 29.7 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 46 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7215 current US$ per square kilometre 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre 20.96 current US$ per square kilometre 16.64 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 17.98 current US$ per square kilometre 616.43 current US$ per square kilometre 598.45 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 33.8 current US$ per square kilometre 840.57 current US$ per square kilometre 806.77 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Early-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre against 34.95 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
1,002 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.