El Salvador vs Marshall Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

El Salvador
3,563 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Marshall Islands
3,955 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
4th
Marshall Islands rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Marshall Islands
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k198820052023

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 3,955 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,563 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 392 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

El Salvador ranks 4th and Marshall Islands ranks 3rd of 155 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 12.62 current US$ per square kilometre 206.35 current US$ per square kilometre 193.73 current US$ per square kilometre Marshall Islands
2000s 74.03 current US$ per square kilometre 288.89 current US$ per square kilometre 214.85 current US$ per square kilometre Marshall Islands
2010s 235.9 current US$ per square kilometre 814.31 current US$ per square kilometre 578.41 current US$ per square kilometre Marshall Islands
2020s 1,331 current US$ per square kilometre 2,989 current US$ per square kilometre 1,657 current US$ per square kilometre Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), El Salvador or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 3,955 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,563 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between El Salvador and Marshall Islands?
392 current US$ per square kilometre, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Marshall Islands?
25 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Marshall Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
El Salvador ranks 4th and Marshall Islands ranks 3rd of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Marshall Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/marshall-islands/">El Salvador vs Marshall Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.