Jamaica vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Jamaica
91.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Post-demographic dividend
2.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Jamaica rank
42nd
Post-demographic dividend rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Post-demographic dividend
050100150198820052023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 91.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 88.6 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 37.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 42nd and Post-demographic dividend ranks 41st of 155 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 11.39 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0631 current US$ per square kilometre 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 29.09 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2712 current US$ per square kilometre 28.81 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 39.98 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2151 current US$ per square kilometre 39.76 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 96.21 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8447 current US$ per square kilometre 95.37 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Jamaica or Post-demographic dividend?
Jamaica, at 91.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Jamaica and Post-demographic dividend?
88.6 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Post-demographic dividend?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Jamaica and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Jamaica ranks 42nd and Post-demographic dividend ranks 41st of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/post-demographic-dividend/">Jamaica vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.