Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Malaysia
5.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
107th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Malaysia
  • Zimbabwe
02.557.510198820052023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.31 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 107th of 155 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3729 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1099 current US$ per square kilometre 0.263 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6248 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
0.31 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Malaysia ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 107th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/zimbabwe/">Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.