OECD members vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

OECD members
1.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Uzbekistan
87.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
42nd
Uzbekistan rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Uzbekistan
050100150198820052023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 87.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 85.6 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 55.5 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 42nd and Uzbekistan ranks 45th of 46 groups.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1756 current US$ per square kilometre 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2000s 0.1595 current US$ per square kilometre 14.15 current US$ per square kilometre 13.99 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2010s 0.5748 current US$ per square kilometre 66.38 current US$ per square kilometre 65.8 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2020s 2 current US$ per square kilometre 97.45 current US$ per square kilometre 95.45 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), OECD members or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 87.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between OECD members and Uzbekistan?
85.6 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 42nd and Uzbekistan ranks 45th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/uzbekistan/">OECD members vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.