Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Sri Lanka
285.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
17.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
24th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
25th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 285.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 268.01 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 16.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Sri Lanka ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 155 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 0.5581 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0489 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5092 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 75.94 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4988 current US$ per square kilometre 75.44 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 286.21 current US$ per square kilometre 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre 284.56 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 560.77 current US$ per square kilometre 12.97 current US$ per square kilometre 547.8 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 213.2 current US$ per square kilometre 19.36 current US$ per square kilometre 193.84 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Sri Lanka or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sri Lanka, at 285.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa?
268.01 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Sri Lanka ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/sub-saharan-africa/">Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.