Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Tuvalu
0.0327 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
4th
Tuvalu rank
1st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Tuvalu
00.010.020.03198920062023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.0327 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0322 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 60.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 4th and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 46 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tuvalu
2000s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0067 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0066 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tuvalu
2010s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0037 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0032 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tuvalu
2020s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0082 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0077 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 0.0327 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tuvalu?
0.0322 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tuvalu?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 4th and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/tuvalu/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,266 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.