Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Tajikistan
0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Tajikistan rank
29th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
30th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.0010.0010.002198920062023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 29th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 155 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Tajikistan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tajikistan, at 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Tajikistan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Tajikistan ranks 29th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/tajikistan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/tajikistan/tanzania/">Tajikistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,266 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.