Belize vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.

Belize
677,009 current US$
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
679,037 current US$
in 2023
Belize rank
109th
Guinea-Bissau rank
108th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. over time

  • Belize
  • Guinea-Bissau
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199120072023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 679,037 current US$ against 677,009 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 2,028 current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 109th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 108th of 155 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 45,714 current US$ 45,714 current US$ 0 current US$ β€”
2000s 180,000 current US$ 70,000 current US$ 110,000 current US$ Belize
2010s 142,683 current US$ 125,812 current US$ 16,871 current US$ Belize
2020s 397,936 current US$ 391,820 current US$ 6,116 current US$ Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep., Belize or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 679,037 current US$ against 677,009 current US$ in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. between Belize and Guinea-Bissau?
2,028 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Belize and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep.?
Belize ranks 109th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 108th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/belize/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/belize/guinea-bissau/">Belize vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 6,327 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.