Eswatini vs Nauru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.

Eswatini
318,087 current US$
in 2023
Nauru
251,795 current US$
in 2022
Eswatini rank
123rd
Nauru rank
126th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nauru
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199120072023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 318,087 current US$ against 251,795 current US$ in Nauru, a difference of 66,292 current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 123rd and Nauru ranks 126th of 155 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nauru Difference Ahead
1990s 115,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ 85,000 current US$ Eswatini
2000s 132,500 current US$ 120,000 current US$ 12,500 current US$ Eswatini
2010s 178,796 current US$ 104,953 current US$ 73,843 current US$ Eswatini
2020s 321,972 current US$ 226,852 current US$ 95,120 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep., Eswatini or Nauru?
Eswatini, at 318,087 current US$ against 251,795 current US$ in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. between Eswatini and Nauru?
66,292 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nauru?
15 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Nauru rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep.?
Eswatini ranks 123rd and Nauru ranks 126th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nauru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/eswatini/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/eswatini/naoero/">Eswatini vs Nauru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 6,327 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.