Nauru vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.

Nauru
251,795 current US$
in 2022
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
246,232 current US$
in 2021
Nauru rank
126th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
127th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. over time

  • Nauru
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199120062022

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 251,795 current US$ against 246,232 current US$ in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 5,563 current US$.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Nauru ranks 126th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 127th of 155 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 30,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ Nauru
2000s 133,333 current US$ 120,000 current US$ 13,333 current US$ Nauru
2010s 104,953 current US$ 84,014 current US$ 20,939 current US$ Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep., Nauru or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Nauru, at 251,795 current US$ against 246,232 current US$ in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. between Nauru and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
5,563 current US$, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
12 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
How do Nauru and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep.?
Nauru ranks 126th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 127th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/naoero/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/naoero/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Nauru vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 6,327 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.