Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
246,232 current US$
in 2021
Uruguay
269,321 current US$
in 2017
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
127th
Uruguay rank
124th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. over time

  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Uruguay
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199120062021

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 269,321 current US$ against 246,232 current US$ in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 23,089 current US$.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uruguay ahead.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 127th and Uruguay ranks 124th of 155 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 27,143 current US$ 108,571 current US$ 81,429 current US$ Uruguay
2000s 80,000 current US$ 136,667 current US$ 56,667 current US$ Uruguay
2010s 94,119 current US$ 136,392 current US$ 42,273 current US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep., Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 269,321 current US$ against 246,232 current US$ in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uruguay?
23,089 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uruguay?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep.?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 127th and Uruguay ranks 124th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/uruguay/">Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 6,327 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.