Aruba vs Fiji: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Aruba
-7.10 million current US$
in 1999
Fiji
-490,000 current US$
in 2009
Aruba rank
163rd
Fiji rank
162nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Aruba
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports -490,000 current US$ against -7.10 million current US$ in Aruba, a difference of 6.61 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 163rd and Fiji ranks 162nd of 163 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 23.35 million current US$ | 452,000 current US$ | 22.90 million current US$ | Aruba |
| 1990s | 18.81 million current US$ | 206,500 current US$ | 18.60 million current US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Aruba or Fiji?
- Fiji, at -490,000 current US$ against -7.10 million current US$ in Aruba as of 2009.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Aruba and Fiji?
- 6.61 million current US$, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Fiji?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1999.
- How do Aruba and Fiji rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Aruba ranks 163rd and Fiji ranks 162nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.