Aruba vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Aruba
-7.10 million current US$
in 1999
Peru
-251,190 current US$
in 2023
Aruba rank
163rd
Peru rank
161st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Aruba
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports -251,190 current US$ against -7.10 million current US$ in Aruba, a difference of 6.85 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Peru ahead.
Aruba ranks 163rd and Peru ranks 161st of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 23.35 million current US$ | 22.16 million current US$ | 1.19 million current US$ | Aruba |
| 1990s | 18.81 million current US$ | 26.93 million current US$ | 8.12 million current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Aruba or Peru?
- Peru, at -251,190 current US$ against -7.10 million current US$ in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Aruba and Peru?
- 6.85 million current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Peru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1999.
- How do Aruba and Peru rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Aruba ranks 163rd and Peru ranks 161st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.