Belize vs Kazakhstan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Belize
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 379,846 current US$ against 350,000 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 29,846 current US$.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Belize ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 67th of 163 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 240,000 current US$ | 401,250 current US$ | 161,250 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 310,833 current US$ | 2.11 million current US$ | 1.80 million current US$ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Belize or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 379,846 current US$ against 350,000 current US$ in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Belize and Kazakhstan?
- 29,846 current US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Kazakhstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Belize and Kazakhstan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Belize ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 67th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.