Bhutan vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Bhutan
- Romania
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2.57 million current US$ against 2.32 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 250,690 current US$.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Bhutan ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 44th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.87 million current US$ | 2.96 million current US$ | 96,500 current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 6.28 million current US$ | 4.76 million current US$ | 1.52 million current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Bhutan or Romania?
- Bhutan, at 2.57 million current US$ against 2.32 million current US$ in Romania as of 2012.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Bhutan and Romania?
- 250,690 current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Bhutan and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Bhutan ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 44th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.