Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Brazil
274,623 current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
313,428 current US$
in 2023
Brazil rank
78th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
76th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050.0M100.0M150.0M196519942023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 313,428 current US$ against 274,623 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 38,805 current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 78th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 76th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 590,000 current US$ 215,000 current US$ 375,000 current US$ Brazil
1970s 1.89 million current US$ 24.50 million current US$ 22.61 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 6.67 million current US$ 60.64 million current US$ 53.97 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 15.49 million current US$ 65.46 million current US$ 49.96 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 8.04 million current US$ 103.45 million current US$ 95.41 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 245,337 current US$ 16.83 million current US$ 16.59 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 291,491 current US$ 304,340 current US$ 12,849 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Brazil or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 313,428 current US$ against 274,623 current US$ in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
38,805 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Brazil ranks 78th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 76th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/tanzania/">Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 8,611 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.