Cape Verde vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands gaps over time
- Cape Verde
- East Timor
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 47,639 current US$ against 44,236 current US$ in East Timor, a difference of 3,403 current US$.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 110th and East Timor ranks 111th of 163 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.70 million current US$ | 175,000 current US$ | 4.52 million current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 7.78 million current US$ | 1.09 million current US$ | 6.69 million current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Cape Verde or East Timor?
- Cape Verde, at 47,639 current US$ against 44,236 current US$ in East Timor as of 2013.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Cape Verde and East Timor?
- 3,403 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2006.
- How do Cape Verde and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Cape Verde ranks 110th and East Timor ranks 111th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.