Chad vs Slovakia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Chad
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 2.49 million current US$ against 2.25 million current US$ in Chad, a difference of 237,950 current US$.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 45th and Slovakia ranks 43rd of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.57 million current US$ | 1.65 million current US$ | 1.92 million current US$ | Chad |
| 2000s | 2.05 million current US$ | 2.84 million current US$ | 791,834 current US$ | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Chad or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 2.49 million current US$ against 2.25 million current US$ in Chad as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Chad and Slovakia?
- 237,950 current US$, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Slovakia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Chad and Slovakia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Chad ranks 45th and Slovakia ranks 43rd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.