Cuba vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Cuba
541,557 current US$
in 2023
Estonia
560,000 current US$
in 2004
Cuba rank
62nd
Estonia rank
60th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Cuba
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 560,000 current US$ against 541,557 current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 18,443 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 62nd and Estonia ranks 60th of 163 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 677,222 current US$ | 601,111 current US$ | 76,111 current US$ | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.83 million current US$ | 648,000 current US$ | 1.18 million current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Cuba or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 560,000 current US$ against 541,557 current US$ in Cuba as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Cuba and Estonia?
- 18,443 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Cuba ranks 62nd and Estonia ranks 60th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.