Czechia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Czechia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2.20 million current US$ against 1.88 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 320,400 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 163 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.87 million current US$ | 27.41 million current US$ | 24.54 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.69 million current US$ | 15.24 million current US$ | 13.55 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Czechia or Zimbabwe?
- Czechia, at 2.20 million current US$ against 1.88 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 320,400 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Czechia ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.