East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
6.27 million current US$
in 2023
Maldives
5.90 million current US$
in 2008
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
34th
Maldives rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Maldives
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196019912023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 6.27 million current US$ against 5.90 million current US$ in Maldives, a difference of 366,510 current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Maldives ranks 32nd of 46 groups.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Maldives Difference Ahead
1980s 141.98 million current US$ 29,500 current US$ 141.95 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 83.81 million current US$ 138,000 current US$ 83.68 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 196.56 million current US$ 2.43 million current US$ 194.12 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Maldives?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 6.27 million current US$ against 5.90 million current US$ in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Maldives?
366,510 current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Maldives?
25 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2008.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Maldives rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Maldives ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/maldives/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 8,611 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.