Eritrea vs Lesotho: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 120,000 current US$ against 90,000 current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 30,000 current US$.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lesotho ahead.
Eritrea ranks 95th and Lesotho ranks 97th of 163 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.85 million current US$ | 701,429 current US$ | 5.15 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 10.03 million current US$ | 302,857 current US$ | 9.72 million current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Eritrea, at 120,000 current US$ against 90,000 current US$ in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 30,000 current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2006.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Eritrea ranks 95th and Lesotho ranks 97th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.