Eswatini vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Eswatini
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 44,236 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 4,236 current US$.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 113th and Timor-Leste ranks 111th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.02 million current US$ | 175,000 current US$ | 845,000 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 463,333 current US$ | 1.09 million current US$ | 630,000 current US$ | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Eswatini or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 44,236 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Eswatini and Timor-Leste?
- 4,236 current US$, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Timor-Leste?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2006.
- How do Eswatini and Timor-Leste rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Eswatini ranks 113th and Timor-Leste ranks 111th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.