Hungary vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Hungary
- Lithuania
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 1.78 million current US$ against 1.19 million current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 590,000 current US$.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.5 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 50th and Lithuania ranks 52nd of 163 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.90 million current US$ | 1.08 million current US$ | 3.82 million current US$ | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.42 million current US$ | 1.22 million current US$ | 196,000 current US$ | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Hungary or Lithuania?
- Hungary, at 1.78 million current US$ against 1.19 million current US$ in Lithuania as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Hungary and Lithuania?
- 590,000 current US$, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Hungary ranks 50th and Lithuania ranks 52nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.