Jordan vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands gaps over time
- Jordan
- Russia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 15.03 million current US$ against 12.78 million current US$ in Russia, a difference of 2.25 million current US$.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russia ahead.
Jordan ranks 20th and Russia ranks 21st of 163 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.62 million current US$ | 15.92 million current US$ | 13.29 million current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 614,000 current US$ | 9.22 million current US$ | 8.61 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Jordan or Russia?
- Jordan, at 15.03 million current US$ against 12.78 million current US$ in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Jordan and Russia?
- 2.25 million current US$, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Russia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Jordan and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Jordan ranks 20th and Russia ranks 21st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.