Kazakhstan vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Kazakhstan
379,846 current US$
in 2023
Oman
370,000 current US$
in 2010
Kazakhstan rank
67th
Oman rank
68th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Oman
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 379,846 current US$ against 370,000 current US$ in Oman, a difference of 9,846 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 67th and Oman ranks 68th of 163 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.21 million current US$ | 125,000 current US$ | 1.08 million current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 430,000 current US$ | 370,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Kazakhstan or Oman?
- Kazakhstan, at 379,846 current US$ against 370,000 current US$ in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 9,846 current US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Kazakhstan and Oman rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 67th and Oman ranks 68th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.