Kiribati vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Kiribati
20,000 current US$
in 2002
Samoa
20,000 current US$
in 2001
Kiribati rank
127th
Samoa rank
127th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Samoa ahead.
Kiribati ranks 127th and Samoa ranks 127th of 163 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62,500 current US$ | 152,500 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | Samoa |
| 2000s | 12,500 current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | 37,500 current US$ | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Kiribati or Samoa?
- Kiribati, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Samoa as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 0 current US$, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2001.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Kiribati ranks 127th and Samoa ranks 127th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.