Kiribati vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Kiribati
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 22,401 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 2,401 current US$.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 127th and Tajikistan ranks 125th of 163 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62,500 current US$ | 3.18 million current US$ | 3.12 million current US$ | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 15,000 current US$ | 440,000 current US$ | 425,000 current US$ | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Kiribati or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 22,401 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Kiribati and Tajikistan?
- 2,401 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tajikistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2002.
- How do Kiribati and Tajikistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Kiribati ranks 127th and Tajikistan ranks 125th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.