Lithuania vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Lithuania
- Poland
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1.19 million current US$ against 1.01 million current US$ in Poland, a difference of 180,000 current US$.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Poland ahead.
Lithuania ranks 52nd and Poland ranks 54th of 163 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.08 million current US$ | 4.35 million current US$ | 3.27 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 1.22 million current US$ | 1.56 million current US$ | 336,000 current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Lithuania or Poland?
- Lithuania, at 1.19 million current US$ against 1.01 million current US$ in Poland as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Lithuania and Poland?
- 180,000 current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Lithuania ranks 52nd and Poland ranks 54th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.